Corrosion in ballast water & cargo tanks

Container ships - Corrosion in ballast water & cargo tanks
Container ships – Corrosion in ballast water & cargo tanks

DNV offers guidance on the matter of corrosion in ballast water & cargo tanks, highlighting that the actual corrosion rate may differ, with factors like temperature and coating condition playing significant roles in the deterioration process.

According to DNV, the actual corrosion rate in ballast and cargo tanks may differ from the assumptions in the rules and the embedded corrosion models. DNV survey data reveals a significant rise in corrosion findings in water ballast and cargo tanks in oil tankers and bulk carriers at the third renewal survey, with a peak at the fourth renewal. That means that for some vessels, the useful life of the effective coating protection may only be about two-thirds of the requirement of the Performance Standard for Protective Coatings (PSPC).

DNV material experts emphasize that the deterioration process is not linear, nor are the consequences. Once the protective coating begins to break down, corrosion advances swiftly, leading to issues such as pitting, edge or grooving corrosion. An analysis of the DNV survey data indicates that many findings were recorded in locations suspected to be exposed to elevated temperatures, where the corrosion rate and spreading were even more advanced.

DNV fleet hull findings: oil tankers/bulk carriers, 2005-2020
DNV fleet hull findings: oil tankers/bulk carriers, 2005-2020

Causes of coating deterioration

The causes of coating deterioration  and failure are complex, often involving multiple factors simultaneously. Corrosion depends on ambient conditions such as salinity, acidity, humidity, temperature, time of exposure, and coating condition. The degradation rates are highly non-linear and time- dependent and vary significantly.

Coating makers claim that most coating failures result from poor surface pre- treatment and/or an inadequate coating application. Conversely, ship insurance companies and charterers argue that most coating failures stem from incorrect specifications (poor design or quality) and operational conditions that exceed design limits. Examples include higher cargo storage temperatures for extended periods, incorrect cleaning procedures, and mechanical damages during cargo and ballast operations.

Influence of temperature on the corrosion rate of carbon steel exposed to seawater
Influence of temperature on the corrosion rate of carbon steel exposed to seawater

Influence of temperature on corrosion

Among all factors affecting the corrosion rate, exposure to high temperatures is often overlooked. Simulation models based on actual test data performed by DNV show that the corrosion rate of bare carbon steel increases by approximately 30% for every 10°C increase in temperature. Coated steel will also be impacted by temperature, as it accelerates the ageing of the coating, leading to early signs of local coating breakdown at hard points, welds and other vulnerable areas.

Ballast tanks adjacent to heated cargo/fuel tanks are a prime example. DNV’s recent surveys reveal that increased steel corrosion was recorded even though the tank coating had been rated “Good” in the previous class survey.

Effects of corrosion damage Loss of structural integrity

Corrosion leads to thickness reductions at both the local and general level. While local corrosion such as pitting or grooving may not represent an overall safety problem, it can facilitate the formations of cracks, holes or surface anomalies, leading to leakage into ballast tanks, which in turn can cause environmental damage, or contamination of cargo with ballast water. A “domino” effect may also occur, whereby steel/ welding wastage and cracking due to local corrosion in multiple members lead to an overload of adjacent members. This can result in their failure under short-term exposure to loads higher than designed, potentially causing serious overall structural failure.

Maintenance/operation cost

Corrosion increases maintenance and repair cost if not addressed promptly. Misjudging the coating condition in areas with an accelerated corrosion rate may necessitate steel renewals even between the scheduled class survey periods, impacting off-hire cost or breaches of contract.

Recommendations

  • Maintenance of coating: Maintaining the original protective coating of the interior surfaces of ballast tanks is one of the most effective methods to prevent corrosion. Repairs should be performed by qualified personnel adhering to the coating maker’s instructions. If not, the risk of early coating damages after repairs is very probable.
  • Regular coating inspections: Implementing a regular inspection and maintenance scheme is essential to identify and address corrosion issues before they become severe.

Instagram Posts from the IIMS @iimsmarine

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Show details
Performance & Marketing Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. This also helps us optimise our marketing campaigns. User data sent to Google Analytics may be used for ad personalization and measurement of our ad campaigns. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

Show details